So where are we?
In Michigan a judge tossed out Sidney Powell's lawsuit implying that the suit was never intended to be won but simply to instill doubt the electoral process. The judge rejected the suit not only for lack of evidence but on several points of law and declared "the people have spoken."
A lawyer working with Powell had the gall to claim the judge didn't review the evidence and was wrong on the law. They're considering an appeal he said.
In Georgia another judge tossed Powell's lawsuit saying "They want this court to substitute its judgment for that of two and a half million Georgia voters who voted for Joe Biden. This I am unwilling to do."
Justice Samuel Alito should take note and repeat this statement about Mile Kelly's Lawsuit in Pennsylvania.
Apparently Powell still has cases pending in Wisconsin and Arizona which I suspect are making allegations similar to the ones in Michigan and Georgia.
Trump filed a suit in Georgia after the recount finished claiming that the state’s election code was “disregarded, abandoned, ignored, altered, and otherwise violated,” resulting in “a sufficient number of illegal votes” being included in the count.
Trump is asking for a new election in Georgia. Reportedly the lawsuit has been rejected for "faulty paperwork." I have no idea what that means.
Mike Kelly's lawsuit claiming that Act 77 violating the Pennsylvania constitution and thus deprived him and others of due process is under review by Justice Samuel Alito. Alito updated the deadline for a response from Pennsylvania to Tuesday at 9 AM from Wednesday.
That would give Alito time to respond to the request for an emergency injunction made by Kelly to prevent Pennsylvania's 20 electoral votes from going to Biden before the Safe Harbor deadline.
While I find it hard to believe that the SCOTUS would overturn an election this lawsuit has concerned me since I first heard about it. If Alito grants the injunction it would open a nasty Pandora's Box.
No comments:
Post a Comment