The Lone Juror

The lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy has become something of a celebrity especially as he turned out to be a black man in his thirties that describes himself as a Black Conservative Republican.

As I said before, half the country wants to tar and feather him and the other half wants to hold him a ticker tape parade.

I wasn't in the courtroom, so I really have little basic for coming to a conclusion, but I think this guy should be applauded for sticking to his decision holding out against the mob.

In other Clancy trial news, her husband, Patrick, has apparently retained council and may be going after the people on social media that have been saying that he murdered the three children.

Good for him. These clowns need to understand that you can't just defame people online without consequences.

Given all the publicity, finding an unbiased jury for a second trial is going to be tricky.

Race for the Senate 2026

Polls are often skewed by 2-3 points. People will express frustration with the party in power even if they usually vote for it. Doing so in a poll is harmless, but doing so in the voting booth is not so harmless, and they tend to revert to the party they support even if they are upset with it. 

I think the polls are skewed 2-3 in the Dems favor especially in typically red states. So, assuming that's correct, I expect Iowa, Texas, Ohio and Alaska to be won by Republicans. That will give the GOP 51 seats and put New Hampshire, Michigan and Maine in play, but I suspect the Dems will still win those three races. Moody (R) will win in Florida. Ossoff will win in Georgia and Cooper will win in North Carolina. 

These calls may change in the eight weeks still remaining, but it's where I think things will go right now.

The Lindsay Clancy Trial

So when from an inclusion in a current events summary to a mainline topic. I will repeat what I said previously just to set the stage.

A woman in Massachusetts, by the name of Lindsay Clancy, is on trial for murdering her three children. There is no question about whether she did it. She admits that she did it and hers lawyers admit that she did it. This hasn't kept feminists on the Internet from claiming her husband did it even though there is video evidence that he was at CVS at the time. The issue being debated is whether she was mentally ill and had been misdiagnosed which led to her being given medicine that made her condition worse rather than better. 

The trial is over, and has ended in a mistrial, but it's interesting how it got there.

It started with a note from the jury saying that they were deadlocked. As per standard procedure, the judge simply sent them back to continue deliberating. There was no indication as to what the split might be.

The jury then sent a second note saying that they were still deadlocked. Superior Court Judge William Sullivan delivered the Tuey-Rodriguez charge, a supplemental instruction urging the jury to make a final effort to reach a unanimous decision. There was still no indication of the split.

Then the jury sent a third note which showed considerable frustration. The note claimed that one lone juror was "refusing to follow the law." They had expressed doubt but refused to vote for acquittal.

Well, that brought us into a whole new situation. It was now clear that the vote was 11-1 for acquittal and the 11 were claiming that the 1 was not following the judge's instructions.

Judge Sullivan read the whole jury a definition of "Reasonable Doubt" and polled each jury as to whether they were prepared to follow the law and his instructions on the law. Each said that they were, so they were sent back for a third time.

Clancy's lawyer, Kevin Reddington, was going a little nuts. His client was one vote from acquittal. He got up and "suggested" that the judge remove the one juror and replace him with an alternate. The judge, correctly in my opinion, refused to do so. Somewhere along the line Reddington used male pronouns to refer to the juror, so everyone concluded that it was a man, even though the jury had six women and only three men. 

The Lone Juror, held out and the judge was forced to declare a mistrial. Reddington threw everything that he could come up with to prevent that, but to no avail.

The court, prosecution and defense have scheduled a meeting for the end of September to discuss scheduling a retrial so it looks like we're going to do this again.

The Internet went a little crazy over this. There was everything from calls for the Lone Juror to be tar and feathered to declaring them a national hero. I'm still not 100% certain it's a man by the way. Given the vitriol going around, they might want to lay low for a while.

It's Been a While

I'd like to talk about what's going on, and I would, if I understood what's going on.

Seriously, everything seems upside down and side ways.

The whole war in Iran seems to be in a state of limbo. There's not a lot of shooting, but still a lot of economic strangulation, although it's hard to tell who's strangling who?

Trump is arguing with Canada again and wants to rename Lake Ontario to Lake America. He really is a fucking moron.

The US debt has topped $40 trillion. That's about $117,000 per person in the US.

The Stock Market is having conniptions. A daily graph of any day recently looks like a roller coaster ride with massive dips for no apparent reason. So-called "experts" are still arguing about whether there is an AI bubble and how big it is. There's definitely a bubble and I'm afraid it might be bigger than anyone wants to admit.

A woman in Massachusetts, by the name of Lindsay Clancy, is on trial for murdering her three children. There is no question about whether she did it. She admits that she did it and hers lawyers admit that she did it. This hasn't kept feminists on the Internet from claiming her husband did it even though there is video evidence that he was at CVS at the time. The issue being debated is whether she was mentally ill and had been misdiagnosed which led to her being given medicine that made her condition worse rather than better.

The NFL season is getting ready to start.

That's all that I can think of at the moment.

Transgenderism

I honestly don't know if transgenderism is a real thing or a mental illness. The majority of biologists, doctors and psychologists appear to consider it a real thing. I'm none of those things, so all I can do is shrug.

However, here's what I do know.

Physical = Relating to things you can see, touch, or experience in the real material world. 

Psychological = Anything that relates to the mind, mental processes, or emotional states.

Sex = Biological traits. Being male or female based on reproductive organs and genes.

Gender = The socially constructed roles, behaviors, expressions, and identities, that cultures consider appropriate for a given sex, at a given point in time.

Sex is an immutable physical characteristic. It can't be changed other than cosmetically. That's a conclusion that I have reached. There are people that disagree with that conclusion.

Gender is a psychological characteristic. It exists on a continuum with man at one end, female on the other end, and varying degrees of gender nonconformity in between.

We have all met people that exhibit gender non-conformities. Usually they're one or two things, so I can sort of understand that, in some cases, there could be a whole bunch of them. But I'm not sure what that means.

What bothers me is that far too many people don't even understand that sex and gender are two different things. How can there be a conversation if people don't agree on the basic definition?

My Credit Limit

I was reviewing my charges on my Bank of America credit card. I have two credit cards. A Chase card and a Bank of America card. I've had the Chase card for a very long time and it's our "online card." The BoA card is our every day card.

Since the Chase card has been around for so long, and I used to use it on business trips when necessary, the credit limit grew over time to $24,800. Don't ask me why it's such a funny number because I don't know. The BoA card credit limit was always $15,000.

From time to time I considered increasing the BoA credit limit, but I never bothered because I never felt that it was really necessary. While I was reviewing my charges, I happened to glance at the credit limit and it was $26,000. 

I didn't request this. I never received a notification that the limit was being increased. This is also a bit of a weird number. Why not $25,000?

So how did my credit limit increase by $11,000? My Chase card used to go up when I came close to, or exceeded, the credit limit. They would just bump it and send me a notice to that effect. But I haven't been close to the limit on the BoA card this year. The highest amount was $7,828.

I have two theories.

The first is that they made me change the way my autopay of the Chase card worked and I got into a bit of a kerfuffle trying to explain that I want the card immediately when it closed and not wait a month until the due. Eventually we figured out a way I could do that.

The second is I had just gotten my yearly "how are we and remember we love you" call from BoA and the agent mentioned that our use of the card had been higher than usual. I did explain that was a temporary thing because, you now, basement leak expenses and all.

In neither case did anyone ask me about increasing the limit. 

Anyway, I now have a total of $50,800 in credit limits on my two cards. I can't wait to see what this increase does to my FICO score.

The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)

Make no mistake. The objective of the DSA is Socialism in the US. All you have to do is look at their web site. Before they change it, and they will, I captured the text.

"Capitalism is a system designed by the owning class to exploit the rest of us for their own profit. We must replace it with democratic socialism, a system where ordinary people have a real voice in our workplaces, neighborhoods, and society.

We believe there are many avenues that feed into the democratic road to socialism. Our vision pushes further than historic social democracy and leaves behind authoritarian visions of socialism in the dustbin of history.

We want a democracy that creates space for us all to flourish not just survive and answers the fundamental questions of our lives with the input of all. We want to collectively own the key economic drivers that dominate our lives, such as energy production and transportation. We want the multiracial working class united in solidarity instead of divided by fear. We want to win “radical” reforms like single-payer Medicare for All, defunding the police/refunding communities, the Green New Deal, and more as a transition to a freer, more just life. 

We want a democracy powered by everyday people. The capitalist class tells us we are powerless, but together we can take back control."

I take no position on this at the moment. But I think it's important that people understand what we're talking about here.