Friday, September 29, 2006

Death Penalty Update

The execution of Clarence Hill in Florida on September 20th brought the total number of executions in the U.S. this year up to 43. Hill’s story is one of those that make you shake your head and wonder if you haven’t been transported through the looking glass.

In June the Supreme Court unanimously decided that Hill’s challenge to Florida’s lethal injection law on the basis of a civil rights violation was proper and should proceed. However, a district court in Tallahassee and an appeals court in Atlanta both refused to hear Hill’s suit saying that HE SHOULD HAVE FILED EARLIER! The Supreme Court then denied his request for a stay of execution by a vote of 5-4.

Let me make sure I understand this properly. In June the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously agreed that the man’s challenge was proper. In other words that he was entitled to have his day in court and be heard. However, this was denied by the lower courts because he filed his case too late and the same Supreme Court, that said his case should be heard, didn’t lift a finger to correct the fact that it had not been heard due to a filing deadline TECHNICALITY!

Just to further add to the Wonderland aspect of the whole thing is that the American Bar Association, three days prior to Hill’s execution, issued a report saying that Florida’s application of the death penalty fails to comply with ABA standards to ensure fairness and accuracy.

Among the problems cited in the report were the twenty-two Florida death row inmates exonerated since 1973, the fact that capital crime defense counsels were inadequately compensated, that there was juror confusion about the rules related to mitigating factors during the sentencing phase, that jurors did not have to arrive at a unanimous death penalty recommendation and that judges can overrule the jury’s recommendation and impose the death penalty which occurred in 166 of the 856 Florida death sentences from 1972 to 1999.

Well at least this time it wasn’t Texas looking ridiculous.

On the plus side of the ledger New Jersey continues to display indications that the death penalty is on the way out there. A state legislator from Cape May has announced that he has changed his mind and now opposes Capital Punishment which increases the majority in the legislature leaning toward abolition and the Asbury Park Press has published an editorial calling for replacing capital punishment with the sentence of life without parole.

There are twelve prisoners, including one woman on New Jersey's death row but the state has never executed anyone under its current death penalty statute.

The NAACP Legal Defense Fund's "Death Row USA" for 2006 shows that the number of people on the death row in the United States is continuing to decline, falling to 3,366 as of July 1, 2006. The size of death row has been in a slow but steady decline since the year 2000.

Nationally, the racial composition of those on death row is 45% white, 42% black, and 11% latino. Of jurisdictions with more than 10 people on death row, Texas (69%) and Pennsylvania (70%) have the largest percentage of minorities on death row. Nearly 80% of the victims in crimes that resulted in executions were white.

California, with 657 inmates, and Texas, with 401 inmates, have the largest death row populations in the country. California has a judicial moratorium on executions in place due to problems with its lethal injection procedures but there’s nothing slowing down the death factory in Texas.

Maybe one day we’ll become as modern and sophisticated as countries like Liberia, Mexico and South Africa and realize how bad an idea capital punishment is.

3 comments:

Cajun Huguenot said...

Hello,

I found your letter to Mr. Cook interesting. I want to comment on just a small section of it.

You wrote "are we smart enough to play God with men’s lives?" Since you brought God into the discussion I think it we should see what God says about the death penalty.

As a Christian I consider the Old and New Testament to be the "word of God" and as St. Paul says Scriptures is "theopneustos" (i.e. God breathed).

In these same Scriptures that are God breathed we find the death penalty santioned by God and it is God who bestows upon us the authority to us take human life when a crime worthy of death is committed. In the Old Covenant there are around 30 capital crimes.

I believe that number is greatly deminished by the context of the New Testament, but the death penalty remains in effect.

We see this in Roman's 11 where Paul says that the civil government is given the sword (capital punishment and war) by God.

Paul also tells Festus, the Roman governor, that "if I be an offender, or have committed any thing worthy of death, I refuse not to die" (Acts 25:11).

The death penalty is first given to man after the Flood. Here (Gen. 9:6) God gives man permission to but murderers to death. We read here "Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man." Capital punishment for murder is tied to the fact that man is an image bearer of God. No man has the right to take the life on an image bearer without God's ok. God does give that ok to the civil government for crimes like murder and no where in Scripture is that recinded.

Coram Deo,
Kenith

Cajun Huguenot said...

Ps. Not all Christians would a gree with me on this issue and if you don't hold the Bible to be the Word of God, than you would not agree with the reasons given above either.

Dominus vobiscum,
Kenith

Alencon said...

Hiya Cajun, glad to make your acquaintance.

I read your comment, on my post related to Sam Cook's article, analyzing what the Bible says about the death penalty. Allow me to make two points.

The first is that it’s my understanding that in God's original covenant with the Israelites he established both a moral relationship and an earthly state relationship. It was God's intent that Israel should have no King because he was to be their King. Of course the ancient Israelites made the mistake of insisting upon an earthly King which led to the anointment of Saul and the long line of Kings of both Israel and Judah.

This was something of a disaster to say the least. All the Kings with the exceptions of David, Hezekiah, Josiah and perhaps Solomon, appear to have been severe disappointments going so far as to raise altars to foreign gods. I’ve been told that there is no provision for an earthly state in the new covenant. We are to render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and concern ourselves with the Kingdom of Heaven to come.

The laws associated with the governing of an earthly state laid out in the Hebrew Bible therefore supposedly no longer apply. Isn't this the reason why folks need not be concerned about Leviticus 20:13, which appears to call for the execution of homosexuals, while still insisting that adherence to moral directives, such as Leviticus 18:22, are still required? Or at least that's what I've been told by my Christian friends when I ask the question.

This changes things dramatically because Caesar is clearly not infallible and what belongs to Caesar is left open by Jesus. I believe this includes the question as to whether Caesar has the authority to impose the death penalty, based upon what Caesar considers worthy of the death penalty, especially given the fallibility of men.

As far as Acts 25:11 is concerned, Paul is making the point that he hasn’t done anything wrong. As far as committing an act deserving of death, I don’t argue that perhaps some exist but since God, in the new covenant has withdrawn the laws associated with an earthly state and earthly punishment, who is to decide what acts, if any, warrant death? I would assume that it’s now Caesar and in the United States Caesar is us.

As for Romans (and I assume you mean Romans 13 and not Romans 11) Paul says some things which, if you accept them as God’s word and not simply Paul’s opinion, this entire country is damned if we don’t immediately put ourselves back under British rule!

Romans 13:1 Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.

Romans 13:2 Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.

Romans 13: 4 For he is God's servant to do you good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword for nothing. He is God's servant, an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.

Let’s not forget that the United States was born of rebellion against an earthly Caesar. You figure King George III was God’s appointed servant? Do you think Hitler or Stalin were God's appointed servants?

Luckily for us, Paul points out in 1 Corinthians 7, that he is wont to offer his own opinion when he has no direct instruction from the Lord. Since even a cursory review of the kings, dictators and other assorted despots that mankind has suffered under makes it clear that not all governing authorities are established by God, this must be one of those cases where it’s simply Paul’s personal opinion.

With God as King and insuring the accuracy of a death sentence I would have no problem with the death penalty as I could be certain that no mistakes would be made. But God abdicated his role as King of an earthly state and left us very fallible men in charge of governing the earthly kingdoms. While God may not prohibit the use of the death penalty, there is clearly no longer any requirement for it. If God does not require it, and it cannot be administered perfectly, then why not abolish it?

I’ll leave you with the same question I asked Cook. Since men are fallible there must be an error rate associated with the administration of the death penalty. What error rate would you find acceptable? One in a thousand? One in a hundred? One in ten? What error rate do you believe Jesus would find acceptable?

The second point is I don’t accept the Bible as the Word of God so, as you point out, the Bible’s position on the death penalty is pretty much irrelevant to me. However, as I hope you can see, I think that we ignore the wisdom of the Bible at our peril. I also think that accepting interpretations of the Bible based upon the prejudices of men from two or three hundred years ago is equally perilous so I'm not terribly bashful about interpreting it for my own self. Sola scriptura right? The Bible is clearly expressed, easilly understood and therefore accessible to all.

Take care.
Alencon