President Joe Biden has declared "The Equal Rights Amendment is the law of the land — now!"
He made this announcement during a speech to the U.S. Conference of Mayors. "It's the 28th amendment to the Constitution — now."
Or, maybe not.
Supporters claimed that when Virginia ratified five years ago that it was the 38th state to do so and therefore the amendment had been ratified. Biden didn't say why he waited until only two days were left in his presidency to make this pronouncement.
Biden can declare whatever he wants but the President has no role in amending the Constitution. The amendment would have to be certified by the National Archivist and the Archivist's office has said that the ERA "cannot be certified as part of the Constitution due to established legal, judicial, and procedural decisions."
There are a flurry of issues with this amendment.
The first issue is time. The original amendment had a time limit in the preamble of March of 1979. Then Congress extended the time limit until June of 1982. A federal district court held that congress had no power to do that. This was appealed to the SCOTUS which allowed the date of June 1982 to pass and then declared that the issue was moot.
Supporters claim that since the time limit was in the preamble it doesn't count. Well, then why did Congress extend it? Even if the original limit didn't count certainly one could argue that the extended one counts. The SCOTUS essentially said so when it declared the issue moot.
The second issue is that six state legislatures, Nebraska, Tennessee, Idaho, Kentucky, South Dakota and North Dakota, have rescinded ratification. The Kentucky resolution to rescind was vetoed by the Lieutenant Governor of Kentucky acting in the absence of the governor.
So there are two questions here. First, can a state rescind ratification? It would make sense that it could in order to give voters a chance to express disapproval.
If it can, then can the governor veto the resolution that rescinds ratification? Although that wouldn't matter here but it leads to the question of whether a governor can veto ratification? I would say he can't veto ratification so he probably can't veto rescinding ratification assuming that a state can rescind ratification.
I think this duck is dead regardless of what Biden says. I'll be surprised if we hear any more about it although it would nice to have the SCOTUS resolve all the open questions.