tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15105361.post6731896709428088011..comments2023-10-29T04:38:42.587-04:00Comments on Alencon's Place: Something from Nothing?Alenconhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08757027241438397244noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15105361.post-6918265050346781352013-06-02T04:41:09.659-04:002013-06-02T04:41:09.659-04:00Thank you for the good writeup. It in fact was a a...Thank you for the good writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it.<br />Look advanced to more added agreeable from you!<br />However, how can we communicate?<br /><br />Here is my web blog :: <a href="http://ww.vbc6.com/index.php?p=blogs/viewstory/18843" rel="nofollow">volet roulant pvc</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15105361.post-46925213911566784122013-05-28T03:37:17.914-04:002013-05-28T03:37:17.914-04:00excellent points altogether, you simply won a logo...excellent points altogether, you simply won a logo new reader.<br />What may you suggest about your put up that you simply made a few days ago?<br />Any certain?<br /><br />Feel free to surf to my homepage <a href="http://demos1.softaculous.com/WikkaWiki/WendixrDwyeriu" rel="nofollow">vitrifier le parquet</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15105361.post-78507778541704769032013-05-28T01:14:50.997-04:002013-05-28T01:14:50.997-04:00Do you have any video of that? I'd love to fin...Do you have any video of that? I'd love to find out some additional information.<br /><br />Here is my blog post :: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3X33mLaCj8" rel="nofollow">comment gagner de l'argent</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15105361.post-9217612795767047552009-10-30T15:51:42.448-04:002009-10-30T15:51:42.448-04:00A fair point. Except that at the Quantum Level, it...A fair point. Except that at the Quantum Level, it really is nothing.<br /><br />While space is not a true vacumn and what we perceive as empty actually contains lots of stuff, the space between sub-atomic particles really is "empty."<br /><br />Therefore the appearance of a new particle really is something out of nothing at least with respect to our universe.<br /><br />Some have speculated that these virtual particles are attmepting to leak, as it were, from some other universe. It which case our universe may simply represent leakage from some universe that tore a big hole in whatever seperates universes.<br /><br />Of course, then the question becomes, where did that universe come from?Alenconhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08757027241438397244noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15105361.post-80202767435584114942009-10-07T08:30:54.834-04:002009-10-07T08:30:54.834-04:00It doesn't make sense to calim that QM is some...It doesn't make sense to calim that QM is something form nothing when you already admit that "nothing" isn't really nothing. <br /><br />If the conclusion that the whole of the string of contingencies is contingent is the fallacy of composition, then why isn't the conclusion that the whole fo the Vacuum flux is "nothing" also the fallacy of composition?<br /><br />In other words the theist says "everything in nature is contignent" the atheist says "ah but the Infinite causal regress is not contingent, just becuase the parts are contingent doesn't mean the whole is contingent." But why doesn't the same logic apply to the vacuum flux? Just because the individual partical relative other particles is coming out of "nothing" it still has the vacuum flux as whole that is a prior condition so it's not coming out of nothing at all. It's coming out a framework that includes something.Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.com